In the landscape of modern Christian thought, few works have sparked as much debate and transformation as E.W. Kenyon’s Two Kinds of Knowledge . Kenyon, often cited as the father of the modern "Word of Faith" movement, presents a theological thesis that is deceptively simple yet radical in its implications: that the knowledge gained through the five senses is fundamentally different from the knowledge gained through the Spirit of God. By delineating between Sense Knowledge and Revelation Knowledge, Kenyon argues that the crisis of the modern church stems from its reliance on human reason at the expense of divine truth. Xxxmmsubcom Tme Xxxmmsub1 Ipzz305720m4v Today
In stark contrast to the sensory-based intellect, Kenyon introduces "Revelation Knowledge." This is not knowledge discovered by human effort, but knowledge revealed by the Holy Spirit. Kenyon posits that the Bible is not merely a historical record or a literary masterpiece to be analyzed with literary criticism; rather, it is a living document authored by God. When a believer approaches Scripture with their spirit rather than their intellect, the Holy Spirit imparts "Revelation Knowledge." This type of knowledge bypasses the skepticism of the mind and takes root in the human spirit. For Kenyon, this is the key to the "Zoe" life—the absolute life of God. It is through this revelation that a believer understands their identity in Christ, the reality of the new birth, and the legal rights of the believer. Big Sean Ft. Post Malone - Wolves Mp3 Download - 3.79.94.248
The central tension of the essay—and indeed, of Kenyon’s broader theology—lies in the conflict between these two types of knowledge. He argues that much of modern theology and religious skepticism is the result of attempting to interpret spiritual realities through the lens of Sense Knowledge. When theologians apply rationalistic criticism to the Bible, they strip it of its power, turning the Word of God into mere history. Kenyon argues that this reliance on the "Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil" (human reasoning) caused the Fall, and the church’s continued reliance on it prevents it from walking in the power of the Spirit. He posits that the intellect is often the enemy of faith, as it limits God to the boundaries of what is naturally possible.
Ultimately, the thesis of Two Kinds of Knowledge serves as a call to spiritual action. Kenyon urges the believer to "walk in the spirit," a state where the mind is renewed by the Word rather than the world. The "best" of this text is found in its empowering conclusion: that spiritual truths are not abstract concepts to be debated in seminaries, but tangible realities to be lived. By shifting one’s dependency from the unreliability of the senses to the certainty of God’s written Word, the believer can unlock a life of victory that remains inaccessible to human wisdom alone. In this way, Kenyon’s work challenges the reader to choose their source of knowledge, for the quality of one’s life is determined by the quality of the knowledge by which they live.
Kenyon begins his treatise by establishing the limitations of what he terms "Sense Knowledge." This is the epistemology of the natural world—the realm of science, philosophy, and human intellect. Sense Knowledge is derived strictly from observation and experimentation; it is the domain of "seeing is believing." Kenyon does not dismiss the value of this knowledge entirely, acknowledging that it has brought about advancements in medicine, technology, and civilization. However, he asserts that it is utterly incapable of comprehending the spiritual realm. Just as a microscope cannot measure love or a scale cannot weigh justice, the human mind cannot reason its way to God. Sense Knowledge creates a barrier to faith because it demands evidence before it believes, a stance that contradicts the biblical definition of faith as "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."